Name | folklor/edebiyat |
Membership Category | Scholar Publisher |
Website | https://www.folkloredebiyat.org |
Owner | Prof. Dr. Halil Nadiri Rector of Cyprus International University |
Main Address | Cyprus International University Haspolat – Nicosia – Cyprus |
Other Office Locations | Campus |
Copyright and Licensing Link | Creative Commons 4.0 |
Copyright and Licensing Policy | This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The users of the journal’s website may read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose (Budapest Open Access Initiative’s definition of Open Access: Budapest Open Access Initiative’s definition of Open Access), without violations of academic publishing ethics. There is no charge for the article application and publishing processes.Creative Commons 4.0 |
Complaint Contact Link | folkloredebiyat@ciu.edu.tr |
Complaint Policy | folkloredebiyat@ciu.edu.tr |
Publication Charge Link | https://www.folkloredebiyat.org/Defaultx.Aspx?ID=77 |
Publication Charge Policy | Initiative’s definition of Open Access, without violations of academic publishing ethics. There is no charge for the article application and publishing processes. |
OASPA Compliant OA Journals | 1 |
OA Articles (approx. number in 12 months) | 143 |
OASPA Compliant OA Books | |
Peer Review Process Link | |
Peer Review Policy | Articles sent to the journal are initially examined and evaluated according to their appropriateness with thejournal’s publication principles and publication rules as determined by CIU’s Preliminary Evaluation Committee.All other technical additions/changes that are beyond this Committee’s jurisdiction are done in collaboration with the author(s). Upon receiving approval from the Publication Committee and Editor, the article is sent to two expert reviewers in the associated field. During the evaluation period, the article will go through a blind review process. In the event there is a conflict between reviewer’s final reports, the article will either be sent to a third reviewer or a decision will be made by both the Publication Committee and Editor. Authors are required to make the suggested or necessary corrections during the evaluation process. In the event where authors disagree with the suggestions made, they need to indicate this with justifications. The final decision is made by the Publication Committee.Articles sent to the journal are not returned. |
Initiatives |
OASPA
Prins Willem-Alexanderhof 5
2595BE The Hague
Netherlands
Website designed and developed by Studio Seventeen Ltd.