Name | International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE) |
Membership Category | Scholar Publisher |
Website | https://www.ijcrsee.com |
Owner | The Association for the Development of Science, Engineering and Education, Serbia |
Main Address | Prvi maj 18, 17500 Vranje, Serbia |
Other Office Locations | |
Copyright and Licensing Link | https://www.ijcrsee.com/index.php/ijcrsee/journal_policies |
Copyright and Licensing Policy | Authors retain copyright of the published papers and grant to the publisher the non-exclusive right to publish the article, to be cited as its original publisher in case of reuse, and to distribute it in all forms and media. Articles will be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence.Authors can enter the separate, additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the published paper (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. |
Complaint Contact Link | https://www.ijcrsee.com/index.php/ijcrsee/journal_policies |
Complaint Policy | Yes—there is a specific complaints & appeals policy. It outlines how complaints are handled in line with COPE flowcharts, and provides the editorial contact for submitting a complaint.
Policy page: “Journal Policies → Complaints and Appeals” (with COPE guidance and procedure).
Where to submit complaints: Editorial Office — editor@ijcrsee.com (see Contact page).
Summary in words: Complaints are acknowledged by the editorial office, assessed by the editors (and, if needed, the publisher/association), and resolved following COPE-recommended steps; appeal routes are available as described on the policy page.
We have applied to COPE and are waiting for a response. |
Publication Charge Link | https://www.ijcrsee.com/index.php/ijcrsee/Article_processing_charge |
Publication Charge Policy | The International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE) is committed to ensuring that financial limitations do not prevent authors from publishing their work. Authors from low-income or lower-middle-income countries (as classified by the World Bank) or those experiencing financial hardship may apply for a full or partial waiver of the Article Processing Charge (APC).
Waiver requests should be submitted at the time of manuscript submission with a short explanation. All requests are reviewed confidentially and independently of the editorial process, ensuring that the decision to grant a waiver does not influence the peer review or acceptance of the manuscript.
Our goal is to support equitable access to scholarly publishing while maintaining the highest standards of academic quality.
For waiver requests, please contact: editor@ijcrsee.com |
OASPA Compliant OA Journals | 1 |
OA Articles (approx. number in 12 months) | 55 |
OASPA Compliant OA Books | |
Peer Review Process Link | https://www.ijcrsee.com/index.php/ijcrsee/journal_policies |
Peer Review Policy | The submitted manuscripts are subject to a peer review process. The purpose of peer review is to assist the Editorial Board in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communication with the author it may also assist the author in improving the manuscript.A manuscript goes through the peer review process – Double-blind peer-review. Double-blind peer review means that reviewers are unaware of the identity of the authors, and authors are also unaware of the identity of reviewers. There are at least two reviewers.The choice of reviewers is at the discretion of the Editorial Board. The reviewers must be knowledgeable about the subject area of the manuscript; they must not be from the authors’ own institution and they should not have recent joint publications with any of the authors.In the main review phase, the Editor sends submitted manuscripts to the two of reviewers’ experts in the field. The reviewers’ evaluation form contains a checklist in order to help reviewers cover all aspects that can decide the fate of a submission. In the final section of the evaluation form, the reviewers must include observations and suggestions aimed at improving the submitted manuscript; these are sent to authors, without the names of the reviewers.All of the reviewers of a manuscript remain anonymous to the authors before, during and after the evaluation process and the authors remain anonymous to reviewers until the end of the review procedure.All of the reviewers of a manuscript act independently and they are not aware of each other’s identities. If the decisions of the two reviewers are not the same (accept/reject), the Editorial Board may assign additional reviewers.During the review process, the Editorial Board may require authors to provide additional information (including raw data) if they are necessary for the evaluation of the scholarly merit of the manuscript. These materials shall be kept confidential and must not be used for personal gain.The editorial team shall ensure reasonable quality control for the reviews. With respect to reviewers whose reviews are convincingly questioned by authors, special attention will be paid to ensure that the reviews are objective and high in academic standard. When there is any doubt with regard to the objectivity of the reviews or quality of the review, additional reviewers will be assigned.Members of the editorial team/board/guest editors are permitted to submit their own papers to the journal. In cases where an author is associated with the journal, they will be removed from all editorial tasks for that paper and another member of the team will be assigned responsibility for overseeing peer review. |
Initiatives |
